A31-065 – False Guarantees

BLM’s Acquisition Queen’s Regime

“Lands’ isn’t always supported because we’re the ‘bad guys.’ We come in, and we take this land. And we always take it for less than it’s worth.”

Commentary: https://goldrushexpeditions.com/blm-leak-stealing-from-wwii-vets/

Dual Trump Double Speak?

Reno Gazzette: http://www.rgj.com/story/opinion/voices/2016/01/07/trump-nevada-us-need-president-who-obeys-rule-law/78422530/

Wash Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/donald-trump-takes-on-federal-land-control/article/2579978

Back Door Statute For Your Phones

Finally, and most importantly, understand that the backers of this outrageous legislation are NOT your friends. Their goal is not to protect your life, liberty or property. Their goal is to maintain and expand their power over you. And this makes them and their ideas very, very dangerous.

Read more at http://thegarrisoncenter.org/archives/4324#9gMTY4x0sW2EbOBr.99

Two major district attorneys are trying to get inside your smartphone. To do so, they’re enlisting the help of assemblymen in California and New York. California Assemblyman Jim Cooper proposed a bill earlier this week that would require all smartphone makers to build back doors into their devices for law enforcement.

Read more at http://www.theverge.com/2016/1/22/10815054/california-jim-cooper-encryption-district-attorney

G Edward Griffin Interviews Soviet Defector on Demoralization of America, 1986

Freedom Force International: http://www.freedomforceinternational.org

Never a Better Time to be a State Citizen, Not a US Citizen-Resident

Experimental Jurisprudence



State Citizenship Does Not Meet with Any of PLF’s Board’s Objectives

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Brien P. Bartels
Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:41 PM
Subject: Pacific Legal Foundation
To Corey Eib

Dear Mr. Eib:

Thank you for contacting Pacific Legal Foundation.  We have reviewed the information in your letter of Jan. 19, 2016, and we have decided to decline involvement in this matter, as it does not meet with any of the current legal objectives approved by our Board of Trustees.

Thank you for your interest in Pacific Legal Foundation. We appreciate your understanding of the demands on our time and resources.



Case Review Analyst

Pacific Legal Foundation

About Pacific Legal Foundation: http://www.pacificlegal.org/page.aspx?pid=4616

Today, PLF stands as the nation’s sentry for freedom — strong, resolute and committed to the principles established by our nation’s Founding Fathers and embraced by Ronald Reagan — that Americans are granted sacred, inalienable rights of life, liberty and private property, and that they must never be surrendered or compromised to arbitrary government actions.

Texas v White Spells Out Different Definitions of State & Guarantee of Republican Form of Government


Texas v White: http://www.thirdrailblog.com/files/Texas-v-White-1868-Wallace-USReports-VolVII.pdf


Posted in Show Notes Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,
7 comments on “A31-065 – False Guarantees
  1. 51rH0n3y84d93r says:

    I don’t recall the statute, but Corey mentioned that anyone on SS was federal personnel, and he also mentioned that no one has likely swore an oath of office.

    If this is the case, wouldn’t everyone in the system be impersonating a federal agent? Wouldn’t nearly all US Citizens be criminals?

    • JFrederickHall says:

      There’s a difference between being federal personnel and being a a federal agent.
      And your premise is wrong: if everybody was (is) in fact federal personnel, then they wouldn’t be impersonating federal personnel/employees because they ARE federal personnel/employees.

      • 51rH0n3y84d93r says:

        My apologies between mixing the two wires of personnel and agents. Thanks for pointing that out.

        My premise was that by using the birth certificate we claim to be federal personnel, but do so improperly by not swearing an oath. (This was assuming that the oath applied to anyone who fell under the federal banner, personnel or agents.) I by no means claim to be an expert.

        Thanks for the reply! :-)

    • JFrederickHall says:

      US Title 5.552a.13

      ‘the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits).’

Leave a Reply

What's your strategy to make a difference?

Want updates? Common Law ID Info?

Subscribing is Complimentary. Financial Supporters Have Access to Corey's SCOTUS Docs, Here.

4:20 Podcast Intro

A31 on THC

Girl Who Doesn’t Exist In US Government

RadioLab Story About Alecia Faith Pennington, who was born on a farm, homeschooled, and never visited a dentist or a hospital. By both chance and design she is completely invisible in the eyes of the state.

Join Corey’s Compass Club

Help Corey get the Diversity of Citizenship heard in an Article III Federal Court. Help Corey have the rights secured by the 2nd Amendment finally adjudicated by an Article IV State Citizen with STANDING! Click here to see what your membership gets you.

Chat Room

How to make a common law ID

Can You Find the US on a Map?

Driving with a Californian – Corey Walks the Talk, Explaining State Citizenship

Non-Domestic 3 Cent Mail Delivery

Book: The Story of Number

This book shows how number contains not only the seeds of our sciences, but the seeds of our religions. To know is only half the story. The other half lives in our belief.